By Capstone Team E – Travis Halliday, Maria O’Hearn, Kelly Stein, Jennifer Szakacs
Restorative justice is a criminal justice approach with the goal of healing both victim and offender. It aims for participation with all involved while holding offenders responsible for their actions and encouraging introspection of the cause of their behaviour.
This approach is increasingly being applied across Canada leading to better outcomes for both victims and offenders. However, its application in a parks and protected areas context in Canada is unknown.
Our objective as a capstone team in the CPCIL Park Leaders Development Program was to pull the curtain back to find out if and how the process is used within our parks collective. This would result in a snapshot of the current state of restorative justice that others looking to venture down this road could access.
Our preliminary research of journals, news articles and other online resources turned up very little on the use of restorative justice within a parks context. So were we boldly going where no one has gone before? A bit more time plus a thorough jurisdictional review and numerous interviews would tell.
We set out to delve deeper into restorative justice application in a conservation context to get a baseline of usage from jurisdictions across Canada. Our online survey posed questions to the Canadian Parks Council network like:
- Who is using restorative justice?
- What cases are referred?
- What training is used?
- What challenges are faced?
So, did we boldly go into uncharted territory? Most certainly. We received six responses from across the country, five of which do not use restorative justice and one respondent applies restorative justice in a marine conservation context. The responses received, along with the fairly low response rate, indicates that restorative justice is not widely used in parks and protected areas.
However, our interviews with subject matter experts show that restorative justice is applied in other contexts, such as offences involving wildlife and natural resource-related enforcement. This presents an opportunity to build a restorative justice program for parks and protected areas by basing it on these related programs. There is more work that can be done to dig deeper.
Recommendations for further work to promote the use of restorative justice in parks and protected areas across Canada include:
- Follow up with survey respondent from the jurisdiction currently applying restorative justice to build a case study.
- Develop case studies in related fields such as wildlife offences which could provide the groundwork for developing restorative justice programs in parks and protected areas.
- Promote the use of restorative justice in parks and protected areas across Canada through the Canadian Parks Council network.
- Start a forum devoted to restorative justice on the CPCIL website to facilitate information exchange among interested practitioners.
- Consider revisiting this topic to explore how restorative justice is applied in 5-10 years.
The benefits of restorative justice are far-reaching yet underutilized in parks and protected areas. So we have a mission for a future capstone team: to go boldly into this new world of restorative justice in a parks and protected areas context. We are keen to see what the future holds.
What restorative justice programs or examples have you heard of? Let us know in the comments below.